| |
 |
400-201 BC
PART II
| |
HISTORY: PART
I,
II,
III,
IV,
V,
VI,
VII,
VIII,
IX |
| |
RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY: PART
X,
XI |
| |
ART: PART
XII,
XIII |
| |
LITERATURE, MUSIC: PART
XIV |
| |
SCIENCE, DAILY LIFE: PART
XV |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
CONTENTS |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Domenico
Ghirlandaio, Furio Camillo |
Plutarch, Camillus:
"Camillus ... assumed more to
himself than became a civil and legal magistrate; among
other things, in the pride and haughtiness of his
triumph, driving through Rome in a chariot drawn with
four white horses, which no general either before or
since ever did; for the Romans consider such a mode of
conveyance to be sacred, and especially set apart to the
king and father of the gods.
This alienated the hearts
of his fellow-citizens, who were not accustomed to such
pomp and display..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HISTORY |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
400-351 BC |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |

M. Manlius Capitolinus, accused of royal
ambitions, is thrown from the Tarpeian rock -384
The 30th dynasty in Egypt
(-380 to -343), last native house to rule the country
Massacre of the Spartan tyrants at
Thebes by Pelopidas and Epaminondas -379
Battle of Leuctra: Thebans under Epaminondas
defeat Sparta-371
The first plebeian elected to office of consul in Rome -366
Marcus Furius Camillus, Roman general and dictator, d. -365
Epaminondas, Theban general, killed in the Battle of Mantinea -362
Cappadocia becomes a kingdom under Ariarathes I -360
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
400-351 BC |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Marcus Manlius Capitolinus |
| |
|
| |
Marcus Manlius
Capitolinus (died 384 BC) was consul of the Roman
Republic in 392 BC. He was the brother of Aulus Manlius
Capitolinus. The Manlii were a patrician gens.
During the Gallic siege of Rome in 390 (or 387) BC, the
account of which became partly mythologized, Marcus
Manlius held out for months with a small garrison on the
citadel (arx), while the rest of Rome was abandoned.
When Gauls under the command of Brennus were attempting
to scale the Capitoline, Manlius was roused by the
cackling of the sacred geese, rushed to the spot, and
threw down the foremost assailants.
|
| |
|
| |

Marcus Manlius Capitolinus (392 av J.C.) jeté dans
le Tibre |
|
After the sack of Rome
left the plebeians in pitiful condition, they were
forced to borrow large sums of money from the
patricians, and once again became the poor debtor
class of Rome. Manlius, the hero of Rome, fought for
them.
Livy says, with some inaccuracy, that he was the
first patrician to act as a populist (popularis).
Seeing a centurion led to prison for debt, he freed
him with his own money, and even sold his estate to
relieve other poor debtors, while he accused the
Senate of embezzling public money. He was charged
with aspiring to kingly power, and condemned by the
comitia, but not until the assembly had adjourned to
a place outside the walls, where they could no
longer see the Capitol which he had saved.
The Senate condemned him to death in 385 BC, and he
was thrown from the Tarpeian Rock one year later. He
is considered the second martyr in the cause of
social reform at Rome.
His house on the
Capitoline Hill was razed, and the Senate decreed
that no patrician should live there henceforth. The
Manlii themselves resolved that no patrician Manlius
should bear the name of Marcus. According to
Mommsen, the story of the saving of the Capitol was
a later invention to justify his cognomen, which may
be better explained by his domicile. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |

The fate of Marcus Manlius |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
400-351 BC |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
The Thirtieth Dynasty of
ancient Egypt |
| |
|
| |
The Thirtieth
Dynasty of ancient Egypt followed Nectanebo I's
deposition of Nefaarud II, the son of Hakor. This
dynasty is often considered part of the Late Period.
|
| |
|
| |

A finely made
gilded silver Ancient Egyptian 30th dynasty mummy
mask from the Gulbenkian museum belonging to an
unknown person. |
|
Nectanebo I had gained
control of all of Egypt by November of 380 BC, but
spent much of his reign defending his kingdom from
Persian reconquest with the occasional help of
Sparta or Athens. In 365, Nectanebo made his son
Teos co-king and heir, and until his death in 363
father and son reigned together. After his father's
death, Teos invaded the Persian territories of
modern Syria and Israel and was beginning to meet
with some successes when he lost his throne due the
machinations of his own son Tjahepimu. Tjahepimu
took advantage of Teos' unpopularity within Egypt by
declaring his son-and Teos' grandson-Nectanebo
II-king. The Egyptian army rallied around Nectanebo
which forced Teos to flee to the court of the king
of Persia.
Nectanebo II's reign was dominated by the efforts of
the Persian rulers to reconquer Egypt, which they
considered a satrapy in revolt. For the first ten
years, Nectanebo avoided the Persian reconquest
because Artaxerxes III was forced to consolidate his
control of the realm. Artaxerxes then attempted an
unsuccessful invasion of Egypt in the winter of
351/350 BC; the repercussions of his defeat prompted
revolts in Cyprus, Phoenicia, and Cilicia. Although
Nectanebo gave support to these revolts, Artaxerxes
would eventually suppress these rebellions and was
once again able to invade Egypt in 343 BC. This
second invasion proved successful, and Nectanebo was
forced to withdraw from his defenses in the Nile
Delta to Memphis, where he saw that his cause was
lost. He thereupon fled south to Nubia, where he is
assumed to found refuge at the court of King
Nastesen of Napata. Nectanebo, however, may have
managed to maintain some form of independent rule in
the south of Egypt for 2 more years since a document
from Edfu is dated to his eighteenth year.
Although a shadowy
rebel Khababash proclaimed himself king (338 - 336
BC), Nectanebo has been considered the last native
pharaoh of Egypt, and his flight marked the end of
Egypt as an independent entity.
Thirtieth
Dynasty:
Nectanebo I (380 - 362 BC)
Teos (362 - 360 BC)
Nectanebo II (360 - 343 BC) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
400-351 BC |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Pelopidas |
| |
|
| |
Pelopidas, (died 364
bc, Cynoscephalae, Thessaly [now in Greece]), Theban
statesman and general responsible, with his friend
Epaminondas, for the brief period (371–362) of Theban
hegemony in mainland Greece.
|
| |
|
| |
In 385 Pelopidas served in a
Theban contingent sent to support the Spartans at Mantineia,
where he was seriously wounded but was saved by Epaminondas.
Upon the seizure of the Theban citadel by the Spartans
(382), Pelopidas fled to Athens and took the lead in a
conspiracy to liberate Thebes. In 379 his party surprised
and killed their chief political opponents and, by arousing
the Theban people, were able to force the Spartan garrison
to surrender. In this and subsequent years he was elected
boeotarch, or chief magistrate, of Thebes. Pelopidas was the
leader of the Sacred Band, a selected infantry body of 300,
which routed a large Spartan force at Tegyra (near
Orchomenus, Boeotia) in 375 and distinguished itself in the
defeat of Sparta at the decisive battle of Leuctra (371).
In 369, in response to a petition of the Thessalians, an
army under Pelopidas checked the ambitions of Alexander,
tyrant of Pherae, and drove the forces of the king of
Macedonia out of Thessaly. Later Pelopidas was seized by
Alexander, and two expeditions from Thebes were needed to
win his release. Finally Pelopidas defeated Alexander at
Cynoscephalae (364) but was killed in the combat. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |

Death of Pelopidas, by Andrey Ivanov, 1805-1806 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Plutarch "Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans"
Life of Pelopidas
Pelopidas, the son of Hippoclus,
was descended, as likewise Epaminondas was, from an
honorable family in Thebes; and, being brought up to
opulence, and having a fair estate left him whilst
he was young, he made it his business to relieve the
good and deserving amongst the poor, that he might
show himself lord and not slave of his estate. For
amongst men, as Aristotle observes, some are too
narrow-minded to use their wealth, and some are
loose and abuse it; and these live perpetual slaves
to their pleasures, as the others to their gain.
Others permitted themselves to be obliged by
Pelopidas, and thankfully made use of his liberality
and kindness; but amongst all his friends, he could
never persuade Epaminondas to be a sharer in his
wealth....
MORE... |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Epaminondas |
| |
|
| |
Epaminondas, (born c. 410 bc,
Thebes—died 362, Mantineia), Theban statesman and military
tactician and leader who was largely responsible for
breaking the military dominance of Sparta and for altering
permanently the balance of power among the Greek states. He
defeated a Spartan army at Leutra (371 bc) and led
successful expeditions into the Peloponnese (370–369,
369–368, 367, and 362), being killed in battle during the
last of those invasions.
|
| |
|
| |
Epaminondas was the son of a Theban aristocrat. His father,
though poor, provided him with a good education.
Particularly attracted to philosophy, the boy became a
devoted pupil of Lysis of Tarentum, a Pythagorean, who had
settled in Thebes. Epaminondas did not at first take any
part in political life but served on military expeditions.
There is a legend that he saved the life of his colleague
Pelopidas in battle in 385.
In 382 the Spartans took advantage of an expedition to
northern Greece to conspire with a few Thebans and seize
power by a sudden coup. For three and a half years the
government was in the hands of this small dictatorship,
backed by a Spartan garrison in the Cadmeia (the citadel of
Thebes). Many of the previous leaders, including Pelopidas,
were driven into exile. Epaminondas remained in private
life, but when Pelopidas, returning secretly from Athens,
successfully overthrew the dictatorship in 379 and
frightened the Spartan garrison into surrender, Epaminondas
is said to have been one of those who led the popular
uprising in Thebes. No individual part is attributed to him
for the next eight years, during which Thebes, in
alliance with |
|
Athens, successfully
fought off Sparta and reestablished its traditional
leadership in a federation of the cities of Boeotia.
In 371 the general war was ended at a peace
conference, but Sparta and Athens combined to refuse
recognition to the Theban federation by insisting
that each city of Boeotia should be a separate party
to the treaty, while Thebes claimed that its
federation should be treated as a single unit.
Epaminondas, who was boeotarch (one of the five
magistrates of the federation), maintained this
position, even when it led to the exclusion of
Thebes from the peace treaty. The Spartans had an
army stationed on Thebes’s western frontier, waiting
to follow up their diplomatic success by a crushing
military attack. But in the Battle of Leuctra (371)
Epaminondas was ready with a tactical innovation.
Instead of the usual advances of heavily armed
infantry drawn up in an equal number of ranks over
the whole front, he massed his troops on the left
wing to the unprecedented depth of 50 ranks against
an overall Spartan depth of 12. The Spartans, who
according to Greek convention had their best troops
on the right wing, were overwhelmed by the force of
the Theban advance. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |

The Death of
Epaminondas after the battle against the Spartans led by
Mantineia in 362 B.C., painting by Isaak Walraven |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
The novelty
consisted in striking the enemy first at their strongest,
instead of their weakest, point, with such crushing force
that the attack was irresistible. The defeat of the Spartans
inflicted such heavy losses on the very limited numbers of
the Spartan soldiers that it seriously threatened the
possibility of raising another Spartan army. The Boeotian
federation had been saved, and after more than a year the
Theban army, once more led by Epaminondas, proceeded to
press home its victory. In the winter (a most unusual season
for Greek warfare) of 370–369 they invaded the Peloponnese
and penetrated the valley of the Eurotas (modern Evrótas).
For the first time for at least two centuries an
enemy army was in sight of Sparta. The subject
population of Helots revolted, and Epaminondas
re-created the state of Messenia, which had been
enslaved by the Spartans for 300 years. He also
encouraged the Arcadians, who had broken from
Sparta’s league, to found Megalopolis (Big City) as
a federal capital.
These new political creations served to keep Sparta
in check so that it was never again a serious
military power outside the Peloponnese. Epaminondas’
brilliant success was met with jealousy and
political opposition at home. He had stayed abroad
over his year of office and was impeached on his
return but acquitted. In 369–368 he led a second
successful invasion of the Peloponnese, gaining
further allies for Boeotia. |
|
In 367 he also served as a common
soldier in an army sent to rescue his friend Pelopidas, who
was a prisoner of Alexander, tyrant of Pherae (Thessaly).
The expedition got into difficulties from which it was only
rescued when Epaminondas was appointed general. This
resulted in his reelection as boeotarch. He then returned to
Thessaly and secured the release of Pelopidas. In 366 he
invaded the Peloponnese for a third time, with a view to
strengthening the Theban position there. He obtained
assurances of fidelity from several states and, perhaps
because of these assurances, decided not to overthrow the
oligarchical governments that had been established by the
Spartans. This was not accepted by the Theban government,
which was in favour of overthrowing the oligarchs and
establishing new democracies.
Athens had supported Sparta and was at war with Thebes. In
364–363 Epaminondas made a bold attempt to challenge Athens’
naval empire. With a new Boeotian fleet, he sailed to
Byzantium, with the result that a number of cities in the
Athenian Empire rebelled against their now-threatened
masters. But the next year the outbreak of civil war in the
Arcadian league brought Epaminondas once more to the head of
a large allied army in the Peloponnese. He was met by
Sparta, Athens, and their allies in the Battle of Mantineia
(362). Epaminondas repeated on a large scale the tactics of
Leuctra and was once more victorious but died of a wound on
the field of battle. With his death all constructive
initiative appeared to vanish from Theban policy. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Battle of Leuctra |
| |
|
| |
Battle of Leuctra, (371 bc),
battle fought on the plain of Leuctra (near modern Levktra)
in southern Boeotia, in which a Boeotian army under
Epaminondas defeated a Spartan army under King Cleombrotus.
This Spartan defeat in the Boeotian–Athenian war against
Sparta of 379–371 destroyed the reputation of the
Spartan hoplite phalanx and established Theban hegemony
in Greece (371–362).
|
| |
|
| |
Epaminondas’ tactical innovations of oblique
order and concentration of forces against the enemy’s
command brought about the Theban–Boeotian victory.
After the Theban refusal to sign the peace agreement of 371,
Cleombrotus, who was in Phocis with about 10,000 Spartan and
allied hoplites and 1,000 cavalry, was ordered to invade
Boeotia and attack Thebes. He was met by Epaminondas’ Theban
force, consisting of about 6,000 hoplites (heavily armed
infantrymen) and an unknown number of cavalry. Eschewing the
usual battle formation of cavalry heading a continuous
hoplite phalanx, with the commander on the right wing,
Epaminondas massed hoplites to a depth of 50 on his left
wing and advanced it ahead of the centre and right wings.
When the superior Theban cavalry drove the Spartan cavalry
back on the phalanx, the Theban left wing attacked and
routed the Spartan right, killing Cleombrotus, the Spartan
king. Xenophon, a contemporary historian, reports nearly
1,000 Spartan dead. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|

|
Battle of
Leuctra
Battle of Leuctra (July 371 BC):
Theban victory broke the power of Sparta, which
had dominated the Greek peninsula since the
Peloponnesian War.
Theban supremacy in Greece
was temporary, and hostile relations led to
Macedonian invasion and control...
MORE... |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
The Battle of Mantinea |
| |
|
| |
The Battle of Mantinea was
fought on July 4 362 BC between the Thebans, led by
Epaminondas and supported by the Arcadians and the Boeotian
league against the Spartans, led by King Agesilaus II and
supported by the Eleans, Athenians, and Mantineans. The
battle was to decide the hegemony over Greece, but the death
of Epaminondas and the defeat of the Spartans paved the way
for Macedonian conquest by Phillip II of Macedon.
|
| |
|
| |

Theban Hegemony, Battle of
Mantineia |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| After the Battle of Leuctra
in 371 BC had shattered the foundations of Spartan hegemony,
Thebes' chief politician and general Epaminondas attempted
to build a new hegemony centered on his city. Consequently,
the Thebans had marched south, into the area traditionally
dominated by the Spartans, and set up the Arcadian League, a
federation of city-states of the central Peloponnesian
plateau, to contain Spartan influence in the Peloponnese and
thereby maintain overall Theban control. In years prior to
the Battle of Mantinea, the Spartans had joined with the
Eleans (a minor Peloponnesian people with a territorial
grudge against the Arcadians) in an effort to undermine the
League. When the Arcadians miscalculated and seized the
Pan-Hellenic sanctuary of Zeus at Olympia in Elis, one of
the Arcadian city-states, Mantinea, detached itself from the
League. The Spartans and Eleans joined the Mantineans in a
military attack on the Arcadian League. Athens decided to
support the Spartans, as she resented the growing Theban
power. The Athenians also recalled that at the end of
Peloponnesian War, the Thebans demanded that Athens be
destroyed and its inhabitants enslaved; the Spartans had
resisted these demands. An Athenian army was sent by sea to
join the Spartan-led forces, in order to avoid being
intercepted on land by Theban forces. Epaminondas then led a
Theban army into the Peloponnese to restore order and
re-establish Theban/Arcadian hegemony there. |
|
Battle
The two
armies met near Mantinea in 362 BC. The Spartans, Athenians,
Eleans and Mantineans were led by the Spartan king,
Agesilaus II. The Theban army also included contingents from
city-states of the pro-Theban Boeotian League. Epaminondas'
Thebans were assisted by the Arcadians loyal to the League,
principally those from the city-states of Megalopolis
(founded by the Thebans when they were last in the
Peloponnese, as the Arcadian federal capital) and Tegea (the
traditional leading city-state of the Arcadians). Though
both generals were highly competent, Epaminondas prevailed
at Mantinea. Using a modified version of the tactics he had
successfully pioneered at Leuctra, he organised the Boeotian
troops on the left wing of his army into an unusually deep
column of hoplites. This formation of troops, in conjunction
with the echelon, sought to establish local superiority of
numbers while delaying the battle on the weaker center and
right side. As Greek battles were pushing-matches, it
allowed the large, dense section of the line to force its
way through the thinner classical phalanx. Epaminondas
personally led this column from the front line. Xenophon (Hellenika
5.2.1-3) described the left wing of that Theban army as
"like a trireme, with the spur of the prow out in front."
Epaminondas charged and routed the Spartan right
wing, winning the battle. Having fought in the front
line, however, he was fatally wounded.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |

Epaminondas and Pelopidas at Battle of Mantineia |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
The Theban leaders Iolaidas and Daiphantus, whom he intended
to succeed him, were also killed. On his deathbed,
Epaminondas, upon hearing of the deaths of his fellow
leaders, instructed the Thebans to make peace, despite
having won the battle. Without his leadership, Theban hopes
for hegemony faded. The Spartans, however, having been again
defeated in battle, were unable to replace their losses. The
ultimate result of the battle was to pave the way for the
Macedonian conquest of Greece, by ensuring the weakness of
both the Thebans and the Spartans.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
Map of "Ancient Greece and its
Battles" |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
400-351 BC |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Marcus Furius Camillus |
| |
|
| |
Marcus Furius
Camillus (ca. 446 – 365 BC) was a Roman soldier and
statesman of patrician descent. According to Livy and
Plutarch, Camillus triumphed four times, was five times
dictator, and was honoured with the title of Second
Founder of Rome.
|
| |
|
| |
 |
|
Early life
Marcus Furius Camillus from Guillaume Rouillé's
Promptuarii Iconum InsigniorumCamillus belonged to
the lineage of the Furii, whose origin had been in
the Latin city of Tusculum. Although this city had
been a bitter enemy of the Romans in the 490s BC,
after both Volsci and Aequi began to wage war
against Rome, Tusculum joined Rome, unlike most
Latin cities. Soon, the Furii integrated into the
Roman society, accumulating a long series of
magistrate offices. Thus the Furii had become an
important Roman family by the 450s.
The father of Camillus
was Lucius Furius Medullinus, a patrician tribune of
consular powers. Camillus had more than three
brothers: the eldest one was Lucius junior, who was
both Roman Consul and tribune of consular powers. A
younger brother was Spurius. The cognomen of
Camillus was the denomination of the Roman acolytes
of religious rituals. Coincidently, during Camillus'
infancy, his relative Quintus Furius Paculus was the
Roman Pontifex Maximus. |
|
| |
|
| |
Early career
Camillus had been a noteworthy soldier in the wars with the
Aequi and Volsci. Subsequently, Camillus was a Military
Tribune. In 403 BC, he was appointed Roman censor with
Marcus Postumius Albinus Regillensis, and, by means of
extensive taxation, took action to solve Roman financial
problems, which were the outcome of uninterrupted military
campaigns.
Against Veii
In 406, Rome declared war against the rival Etrurian
city of Veii. Powerful Veii was a fortified city on
an elevated site, which required several years of
Roman siege. In 401, as the war started to grow
increasingly unpopular in Rome, Camillus was
appointed military tribune of consular power. He
assumed command of the Roman Army, and within a
short time he stormed two allies of Veii, Falerii
and Capena, which resisted behind their walls. In
398, Camillus received consular powers and then
looted Capena.
When Rome suffered
severe defeats in 396, the tenth year of this war,
the Romans resorted again to Camillus, who was named
dictator once more. After defeating both Falerii and
Capena at Nepete, Camillus commanded the final
strike against Veii. He dug the soft ground below
the walls and the Romans infiltrated through the
city's sewage system effectively, defeating the
enemy. |
|
Not interested in
capitulation terms, but in Veii's complete
destruction, the Romans slaughtered the entire adult
male population and made slaves of all the women and
children. The plunder was large. For the battle,
Camillus had invoked the protection of Mater Matuta
extensively, and he looted the statue of Juno for
Rome. Back in Rome, Camillus paraded on a quadriga,
a four-horse chariot, and the popular celebrations
lasted four days.
Camillus opposed the
plebeian plan to populate Veii with half of the
Romans. It would have resolved the poverty issues,
but the patricians opposed it. Deliberately,
Camillus protracted the project until its
abandonment. Camillus rendered himself controversial
in not fulfilling his promise to dedicate a tenth of
the loot to Delphi for the god Apollo. The Roman
soothsayers announced that the gods were displeased
by this, so the Senate charged the citizens and the
sought amounts of gold were retrieved. |

Francesco Salviati, Triumph of Furius Camillus,
Fresco in the Salone dei Cinquecento, Palazzo Vecchio,
Florence, Italy.
Aftermath
To finish Falerii, which was the last surviving enemy of
this war, Camillus was made military tribune again, in 395.
He seized the opportunity to divert the bitter conflict
between Roman social classes into a unifying external
conflict. He besieged Falerii and, after he rejected as
amoral the proposal of a local school teacher who had
surrendered most of the local children to the Romans, the
people of Falerii moved to gratitude, swore peace with Rome.
The entire Italian
Peninsula was impressed by the Roman victories of Camillus.
Aequi, Volsci, and Capena proposed peace treaties. Rome
increased its territory by seventy percent and some of the
land was distributed to needy citizens. Rome had become the
most powerful nation of the central peninsula.
Banishment
The Romans were restive because no plunder had been reaped
out of Falerii. Furthermore, Camillus rejected both the land
redistribution and the uncontrolled Roman population of
Veii. Consequently, he was impeached by his political
adversaries, by an accusation of embezzlement of the
Etrurian loot.
To Camillus, his friends
explained that, although the condemnation seemed
unavoidable, they would help to pay the fine. Camillus
spurned this, opting for the exile. He abandoned Rome with
his wife and Lucius, his surviving son, toward Ardea. In his
absence, Camillus was condemned to pay 1,500 denarii.

Francesco Salviati - Marcus Furius Camillus forbidding the
weighing of gold, from the Sala dell'Udienza
The Gauls
Clusium was reached by the Gauls, who had invaded most of
Etruria already, and its people turned to Rome for help.
However, the Roman embassy provoked a skirmish and, then,
the Gauls marched straight for Rome (July, 387 BC). After
the entire Roman army was defeated at the Allia brook
(Battle of the Allia), the defenseless Rome was seized by
the invaders. The entire Roman army retreated into the
deserted Veii whereas most civilians ended at the Etruscan
Caere. Nonetheless, a surrounded Roman garrison continued to
resist on the Capitoline Hill. The Gauls dwelt within the
city, getting their supplies by destroying all nearby towns
for plunder.
When the Gauls went for
Ardea, the exiled Camillus, who was now a private man,
organized the local forces for a defense. Particularly, he
harangued that, always, the Gauls exterminated their
defeated enemies. Camillus found that the Gauls were too
distracted, celebrating their latest spoils with much
crapulence at their camp. Then, he attacked during a night,
defeating the enemy easily with great bloodshed.

Domenico
Ghirlandaio, Furio Camillo,
Palazzo Vecchio, Firenze
|
|
Second foundation
of Rome
Camillus was hailed then by all other Roman exiles
throughout the region. After he refused a makeshift
generalship, a Roman messenger sneaked into the
Capitol and, therein, Camillus was officially
appointed dictator by the Roman Senators, to
confront the Gauls.
At the Roman base of
Veii, Camillus gathered a 12,000-man army whereas
more men joined out of the region. The occupying
Gauls were in serious need, under quite poor health
conditions. As the Roman Dictator, Camillus
negotiated with the Gallic leader Brennus, and the
Gauls left Rome, camping nearby at the Gabinian
road. A day after this, Camillus confronted them
with his refreshed army and the Gauls were forced to
withdraw, after seven months of occupation (386 BC).
Camillus sacrificed
for the successful return and he ordered the
construction of the temple of Aius Locutius. Then,
he subdued another claim of the plebeian orators,
who importuned further about moving to Veii. After
ordering a Senate debate, Camillus argued for
staying and the Roman house approved this
unanimously. The reconstruction extended for an
entire year.
By this one-year
office, Camillus was the longest of all Roman
dictators. Basically, the Senators had been
persuaded by the disturbing social clashes, which
could be better managed by Camillus. Instead,
Camillus disliked this and, vainly, he requested the
dismissal.
Second regional
war
During the reconstruction, Volsci and Aequi invaded
the Roman territory, some Latin nations revolted,
and the Etruscans besieged Sutrium, which was a
Roman ally. To confront such a crisis, Camillus, who
was military tribune then, was appointed Roman
dictator yet again, in 385 BC.
When the enemy
besieged Rome, Camillus slew most invaders at the
Marcian heights, setting fire to their palisades
during the windy hours of dawn. Subsequently,
Camillus defeated Volsci southeastward, in the
Battle of Maecium, not far from Lanuvium (389 BC).
Camillus proceeded then, capturing Bola (Aequi's
capital) and subjecting Volsci. However, the Romans
lost Satricum and Camillus failed to capture Antium,
the capital of the Volsci. |
Finally, Camillus arrived
at Sutrium where the population had just been expelled by
the Etruscans. Camillus estimated that they would be given
to boisterous celebrations in Sutrium, so he rushed to the
confrontation; the Etruscans were so intoxicated that
Camillus recaptured Sutrium with ease.
After this campaign, the
Roman dictator Camillus celebrated a Triumph in Rome.
Through Camillus, the Romans had proven their military
professional strength and offensive readiness.

Camillus chases the Gauls
from Rome
Further profile
Military tribune (381 BC)
In 381 BC, Camillus was military tribune of consular power
again. His office was troubled chiefly by the charismatic
Marcus Manlius Capitolinus, who became his greatest
detractor and around whom all plebeians had aggregated.
While Capitolinus had kingly dreams even, he attacked
Camillus actually with precisely such kinglike accusation.
Nonetheless, Capitolinus was formally judged and executed.
Military tribune (378
BC)
The southern nations were contemptuous against the Romans
after their latest expedition. Several cities of Volsci
united, such as Antium, Praeneste, and Velitrae. They
liberated Satricum, slaying all Roman inhabitants. Before
such crisis, Camillus was appointed military Tribune of
consular power, for the sixth time.
His health was poor but his
retirement was refused. Camillus decided then that he would
command through his son Lucius. Thus, Camillus campaigned.
At the battlefield, although Camillus helped the military
actions safely, from a distanced camp, Lucius couldn't cope
with his duties so Camillus jumped into the battlefield. It
was so that the Romans defeated their enemy. Camillus headed
then to Satricus with his youngest men and it was retrieved.
Because many war prisoners
were of Tusculum, Camillus headed the romans thither and the
city was bloodlessly adjoined with the Romans whereas its
citizens were endowed with fully Roman rights. Such
favorable development was due to the local relatedness of
the Furiis.
After these events,
Camillus decided that he would retire definitively.

The treacherous Schoolmaster of Falerii
Roman dictator (368 BC)
Camillus was appointed Roman dictator (368 BC), nominally to
attend the war of Velletri. However, at Rome, the patricians
of the Senate were expecting, actually, that Camillus would
be their leverage against the agitated plebeians because the
crisis of social classes had worsened by a quite severe
economical pass.
For the Roman magistracy,
the populists were demanding a dyad of Roman consuls, of
whom one should be a plebeian always. Through a bogus
military call, Camillus attempted to trick the plebeian
concil so it might not meet to approve such plans. The
enraged assemblymen were about punishing Camillus when he
renounced his office of Dictator.
Roman dictator (367 BC)
As the Gauls were, again, marching toward Latium, all Romans
reunited despite their severe differences. Camillus was
named Roman dictator for the fifth time then (367 BC). He
organized the defense of Rome actively. By the commands of
Camillus, the Roman soldiers were protected particularly
against the Gallic main attack, the heavy blow of their
swords. Both smooth iron helmets and brass rimed shields
were built. Also, long pikes were used, to keep the enemy's
swords far.
The Gauls camped at the
Anio river, carrying loads of recently gotten plunder. Near
them, at the Alban Hills, Camillus discovered their
disorganization, which was due to unruly celebrations.
Before the dawn, then, the light infantry disarrayed the
Gallic defenses and, subsequently, the heavy infantry and
the pikemen of the Romans finished their enemy. After the
battle, Velitrae surrendered voluntarily to Rome. Back in
Rome, Camillus celebrated with another Triumph.

Sebastiano Ricci,
Marcus Furius Camillus and Brennus
Issue of the social
classes
At Rome, the plebeians were insisting about the dyad of
Consuls. The patricians kept refusing uncompromisingly and,
again, they sought protection behind Camillus' figure. The
populists attempted to arrest Camillus but, timely, he
convoked a Senate session, during which he convinced the
assembly effectively for the satisfaction of the popular
demand, through the Lex Licinia Sextia (367 BC).
The creation of the new
plebeian magistracy ensued in general celebrations. Camillus
ordered the construction of the Temple of Concord, which
would be emplaced beside the Roman Forum.
Death
A deadly pestilence struck Rome and it affected most Roman
public figures. Camillus was amongst them, passing away in
365 BC. His death was deeply mourned as he was named "the
second founder of Rome."
From Wikipedia, the
free encyclopedia |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |

MARCUS FURIUS CAMILLUS BRINGS STATUE OF JUNO
TO ROME
The wealth of detail in the Gardner’s “Marriage”
is spellbinding.
|
| |
|
| |
Plutarch "Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans"
Life of Camillus
Among the many remarkable things that are
related of Furius Camillus, it seems singular
and strange above all, that he, who continually
was in the highest commands, and obtained the
greatest successes, was five times chosen
dictator, triumphed four times, and was styled a
second founder of Rome, yet never was so much as
once consul....
MORE...
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
400-351 BC |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |

Ancient Coinage of Cappadocia |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ariarathes
I of Cappadocia |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ariarathes I
(Ancient Greek: Ἀριαράθης, Ariaráthēs; ruled 331 BC or
330 BC – killed 322 BC), the son of the Cappadocian
satrap Ariamnes I, was distinguished (Φιλάδελφος,
Philádelphos) for his love of his brother Holophernes,
whom he sent to assist his overlord king Artaxerxes III
in the recovery of Egypt, 350 BC.
|
| |
|
| |
Then he
devotedly supported Darius III. Alexander the Great
conquered Cappadocia during his route and installed a
governor there (though two different names of this governor
are given). Nevertheless, by the time of Alexander's death
Ariarathes somehow assumed power as the first king of
Cappadocians and even expanded the kingdom by subduing
Cataonia.
After the death of Alexander, 323 BC, Perdiccas appointed
Eumenes governor of Cappadocia; but upon Ariarathes refusing
to submit to Eumenes, Perdiccas made war upon him.
Ariarathes was defeated, taken prisoner, and crucified,
together with many of his relations, 322 BC. Eumenes then
obtained possession of Cappadocia. Ariarathes was 82 years
of age at the time of his death: he had adopted as his son
Ariarathes II, the eldest son of his brother Holophernes. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
The Struggle for Supremacy- 2
|
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
|
|
"More than a thousand Athenians fell in the battle [of Chaeroneia, 338 ВС] and no fewer than 2,000 were captured
... The story is told that in the drinking after dinner
Philip ... paraded through the midst of the captives,
jeering at the misfortunes of the luckless men. Now Demades,
the orator, who was one of the captives, spoke out boldly to
curb the king's disgusting exhibition: 'O King, when Fortune
has cast you in the role of Agamemnon [conqueror of Troy],
are you not ashamed to act the part of Thersites?' Stung by
this well-aimed rebuke, Philip altered his whole demeanour
completely. He ... expressed admiration for the man who
dared to speak so plainly: he freed him from captivity and
... ended by releasing all the Athenian prisoners without
ransom and, altogether abandoning the arrogance of victory,
sent envoys to the people of Athens and concluded with them
a treaty of friendship and alliance."
Diodorus Siculus (1st century ВС) Library of History (1963
trans.) Bk 16.86-7. Diodorus' 40-volume work was a
compilation of earlier sources. Thersites was the abusive
commoner who taunted his commander in the Iliad and in
Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida.
****
"At the Battle of Chaeroneia, Alexander is said to have
been the first man that charged the Thebans' Sacred Band ...
His early bravery made Philip [his father] so fond of him
that nothing pleased him more than to hear his subjects call
himself their general and Alexander their king."
Plutarch (c.46-c 127) (1876 trans.) 'Alexander' Ch.9. For
the Sacred Band see 61:2.
****
"In this year [336 BC] King Philip opened the war with
Persia by sending an advance party into Asia while he
himself, wanting to enter upon the war with the gods'
approval, asked the Pythia [priestess who transmitted the
oracular words of Apollo at Delphi] whether he would conquer
the king of the Persians. She gave him the following
response: 'Wreathed is the bull. All is done. There is also
the one who will smite him.' Now Philip found this response ambiguous but accepted it in
a sense favourable to himself, namely that the Persian would be slaughtered like a sacrificial
victim. Actually, however, it was not so, and it meant that
Philip himself, in the midst of a festival and holy
sacrifice, like the bull, would be stabbed to death while
decked with a garland."
Diodorus Siculus (Ist century ВС)
(1963 trans.) Bk 16.91.1-3.
****
"Every seat in the theatre was taken when Philip appeared
wearing a white cloak, and by his express orders his
bodyguard kept away from him and followed only at a
distance, since he wanted to show publicly that he was
protected by the goodwill of all the Greeks and had no need
of a guard of spearmen."
Diodorus Siculus (I st century ВС)
(1963 trans.) Bk 16.93.1.
****
"Pausanias nursed his wrath implacably and ... when he saw
that the king was left alone, rushed at him, pierced him
through his ribs and killed him; then ran for the gates and
the horses which he had prepared for his flight ... Having a
good start he would have mounted his horse before they could
catch him had he not caught his foot in a vine and fallen.
As he was scrambling to his feet, the rest of the bodyguards
caught up with him and killed him with their javelins."
Diodorus Siculus (I st century ВС) (1963 trans.) Bk 16.94.3.
The murder of Philip in 336 ВС, when he was 46 and Alexander
was 20 years old, took place in the theatre at the
celebration of his daughter's wedding. The assassin, one of
Philip's seven high-ranking bodyguards, had a personal
grudge, but those who were probably behind the murder were
never caught.
****
"When he died Qlympias [Philip's estranged wife and mother
of Alexander] took his baby son, the child of Attalus' niece
Cleopatra, and murdered the child and the mother together by
dragging them onto a bronze oven filled with fire."
Pausanias Guide to Greece (c AD 150: 1971 trans.) Bk 8.7.
This and other stories hostile to Olympias derive from her
enemy Cassander, who finally won the struggle for control of
Macedonia and Greece after Alexander's death.
****
"What was the duty of Athens when she perceived that
Philip's purpose was to establish a despotic empire over all
Greece? What language, what counsels, were incumbent upon an
adviser of the people at Athens... when I was conscious
that... our country had ever striven for primacy and honour
and renown, and ... had expended her treasure and the lives
of her sons far more generously than any other Hellenic
state fighting only for itself; and knowing as I did that
our antagonist, Philip himself,
contending for empire and supremacy, had endured the loss of
his eye, the fracture of his collar-bone, the mutilation of
his hand and his leg, and was ready to sacrifice to the
fortune of war any and every part of his body, if only the
life of the shattered remnant should be a life of honour and
renown?"
Demosthenes On the Crown (330 ВС; 1926 trans.) 66.
The orator and statesman set out to justify his stance
against Philip in a case that did not come to court until
330 ВС, six years after the death of Philip.
****
"In the first place, Philip was the despotic commander of
his adherents: and in war that is the most important of all
advantages. Secondly they had their weapons constantly in
their hands. Then he was well provided with money: he did
whatever he chose, without giving notice by publishing
decrees, or deliberating in public, without fear of
prosecution by informers or indictment for illegal measures.
He was responsible to nobody: he was the absolute autocrat,
commander and master of everybody and everything. And I, his
chosen adversary - it is a fair inquiry - of what was 1
master? Of nothing at all! Public speaking was my only
privilege - and that you permitted to Philip's hired
servants on just the same terms as to me."
Demosthenes (330 ВС; 1926 trans.) 235-6. The traditional
city-state, especially with a democratic constitution, was
ill fitted to respond to the ambitions of Philip.
|
| |
 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
CONTENTS |
| |
|
| |
 |
|
|
|